Why Employers Deny Inclusion Issue?

Why Employers Deny Inclusion Issue?

In my 15 year career as an engineer, I truly thought the issue with diversity and inclusion would have improved. Instead it is getting worse at least for African American women. The current statistics on all races of women is 40% leave engineering for good. Why? What is causing this exodus? One reason is LACK of inclusion.

During my trip to San Francisco to attend the Black Enterprise Tech Connect Summit, I’ve been renewed and highly encouraged in the work I’m doing. I want to focus on one speaker's statement about having a diverse workforce. That speaker was Stewart Butterfield, the CEO of the tech company, Slack.

As it’s been publicized tech corporations have a very low number of minority engineers. Slack has a 7% African American rate for engineers. You're like, "Wow, that's low." Actually, in tech 7% is actually high. Stewart Butterfield, the CEO of Slack stated was he did not talk about diversity. He did not say, "Oh, we have to go out and recruit more," or, "We have to go out and take one person from Facebook or another tech company and bring them in." He was like, "That doesn't change anything." He added, "All I'm doing is moving bodies, that is not a growing diversity. That is just me taking one technical expert of color to a different organization.”

He's like, "That does nothing for the industry." He said, "You have to be intentional." He said, "Okay, so …" He not only talked a little bit about diversity but what said, which I had not heard anybody say what they did for inclusion and address inclusion. He said, "I need higher numbers so the African American engineer person, employee is not lonely, they don't feel out of place, they don’t feel excluded. They feel accepted. That they are in a work space where they can see people who look like them." Nobody else said that shit. Nobody wanted to address inclusion. He sat there and said, "Okay, so I bring them over to my company, they leave the industry."

He specifically sat there and addressed the issue which is, you can bring in 10,000 people of color. If 5,000 leave stem, leave tech, leave engineering, you have not solved the problem, none whatsoever. He's sitting there addressing the problem on a whole which not only is one part, bringing in and educating minorities in tech, in engineering, but how do you keep them in the field. They are leaving the field. They're not leaving an employer, they're not leaving Silicon Valley, they're not leaving California, the West Coast, they're completely leaving the industry. How do you go about changing that?

When he was on stage the interviewer said, "We want to discuss diversity at Slack." He said, "Well, the company was started by four white guys." but let me tell you what he said in there that really was interesting.

The National Science Foundation (NSF) tracks college graduation and employment rates for STEM majors and employees. Looking at the 2015 graduation rates for women of color in STEM majors

I'm sitting there like, "Something is not right for somebody to come outside of the US to be willing to address it openly, honestly, and say, "There is an issue in this industry," and they're not even American. It was just like, "Really dude? You're not even American and you want to talk about this?" Maybe that's what it is. Maybe because he has a different perspective, maybe because he's not from the US, he's been here for a long time that he sees it a different way. Wherein maybe as an American if you're Caucasian, well that's just the way it is. He does not have that perspective so it's really interesting to hear him talk about Slack and he wanted to do inclusion, not just diversity.

Why Should U.S. Manufacturing Companies Create & Use Talent Marketplaces?

Why Should U.S. Manufacturing Companies Create & Use Talent Marketplaces?

Manufacturing companies contribute greatly to the growth of the economy of a country. The U.S. specifically has many manufacturing industries, however, most of them lack workforce power and the challenges of finding the right talents to fill a position are daunting owing to many people’s beliefs regarding careers. 

Finding the right individual with a heterogenous skill set at the right time, place, and position is where the talent marketplace comes into play. Some people still believe the manufacturing industry is poor in the use of technology which is why skilled people are not applying to fill the vacant positions. But with the talent marketplace, U.S. manufacturing companies will have the opportunity of selecting the right candidate to occupy a position and also show the citizens the improvement in the industry.

Also, due to the technical nature of today’s manufacturing facilities, heterogeneity, geolocation, and specialized skills by job type, it is even more difficult to rely on old hiring and recruitment tactics. While experienced talent acquisition people and niche job boards help, utilizing a talent marketplace can lead to identifying internal talent at higher rates while retaining current employees.  The following are the reasons why U.S manufacturing companies should create and use a talent marketplace:

1.  Access to a circle of talented and admirable workers

The talent marketplace provides the manufacturing industry with a larger pool of talented workers than hiring through the job board. It uses powerful software to find hot-breed workers and connect them with the right opportunity. It provides employers and employees with more options over the deal.

2. Automated workflow and hiring

Manufacturing companies can automate the recruiting process, and hire qualified people more quickly by using vertical talent markets to fill positions that are difficult to fill.

Talent marketplace user-friendly procedures enable employees to spend less time looking for their next assignment or promotion. It allows the creation of new seamless employee recruiting and retention processes in the manufacturing industry.

3. Reduction in cost

One of the reasons why U.S. manufacturing companies should look into creating and using a talent marketplace is the reduction of cost. Offline recruiting agencies’ fees, mobilization, and training packages are not necessary for the talent marketplace.

4. Pre-screened and validated candidates

It enabled all workers to be screened properly and picked out the best candidates that fit a position. There is no bias in its matching.

In conclusion, with the state of U.S. manufacturing industries, it is arguable that the talent marketplace is the best solution to provide a diverse workforce for productive activities.


Here’s what you’ve missed:

History of Talent Marketplace: Definition, Differs from Job Boards, Benefits and Features

Talent Marketplace: Creating The Future Workforce U.S. Manufacturing Companies

Talent Marketplace: Creating The Future Workforce U.S. Manufacturing Companies

Talent Marketplace: Creating The Future Workforce U.S. Manufacturing Companies

Working remotely is seen as a productive option and the best means for everyone to work in the comfort of their place anywhere in the world. and this is also what Human Resources (HR) teams prioritized to skyrocket their workplace agenda and retention rates. These transformations in the U.S. manufacturing industry have taught employers and workers a lot of things, however, the most crucial is how adaptable the workforce and organizations are and can be. 

We should be optimistic that the future of work is going to be great but technology has a great role to play. Part of this technology is the talent marketplace. It has the potential of creating a great future workforce for U.S manufacturing companies.

According to Deloitte recent studies show there are thousands of talented employees searching for job opportunities. Currently, 65.8% of employees are into job hunting because they want better opportunities.  Other employees also believe there are more opportunities outside their current employer and are looking to pursue another career. This is where the talent marketplace comes into play.

 

With the increasing number of people who desire to explore other opportunities in another field, we can say the talent marketplace is the future of work. If the U.S. manufacturing industry can make use of this opportunity, a booming future is assured in the industry because they would have a pool of talents ready to work within the organization.

The talent marketplace will enable the manufacturing industry to have access to diverse talents now and in the future. It will also focus on internal recruitment rather than external recruitment. It will make boundaries and career trajectories much more permeable and multi-directional. 

It is calculated that in 2030, there would be over 2 million unfilled positions in the skill gap in the manufacturing industry. However, with technology like the talent marketplace, the future can be determined and more talent can be trained to close the skill gaps of today and the future manufacturing industry. This in turn makes the future of U.S manufacturing companies more promising. 

The talent marketplace is built around the ontology of skills, the accumulation of talents, the interest of workers and HR leaders, and the organizational demand for an effective talent workforce. So much of what the future workplace of the US manufacturing industry looks like is much of advanced strategy and finding the right talented employees.

The marketplace will also allow the organization to develop a future-focused workplace strategy to accommodate new workers and create improved production.

In conclusion, due to the huge U.S manufacturing workers shortage, the talent marketplace is seen as the solution provider to correct the growing skill gaps and make workers available in the future for increased production.


 

You might also like:

How U.S. Manufacturing Companies can Utilize a Talent Marketplace To Retain Women Of Color

5 Strategies For A More Efficient Talent Marketplace

Engaged To Retain: Driving Retention Through Engagement Analytics

Many workplace challenges have developed from the pandemic. Human Resources professionals have had to use their skill sets and technology to overcome them. One of the most common workplace challenges is the decrease in employee engagement.

During this session, Marissa Lee shares how she used analytics to drive retention within organizations. She will share how she was able to increase employee engagement, especially during the pandemic, by integrating data analytics with HR tactics, over a short time period.

Learn how you can use HR or Engagement analytics to improve your employees’ participation during difficult times.

 

Next up is a great speaker named Marissa Lee, who’s also an expert and authority in human resources. She is going to be sharing with us how she has used data in employee engagement. Because right before my internet dropped out, I was talking about employers shifting their employees lash in 2020. To their home. So working remote, and what did that look like in organizations? Like, how do we know they’re working? How are they feeling? What are they doing? How do we make this better without being in the office? So she is going to come welcome Marissa, and join us to have that discussion about employee engagement. Hi, Marissa. You are on mute. Hold on, I got you. No, no. Let’s try it again.

That’s a good Oh, hi, how are you? I’m making it work. Okay. So can you tell everyone a bit about your experience in HR being a leader? And we’ll start there?

Absolutely. So hello to everyone. My name is Marissa Lee, and I am the founder and CEO of soul evolve, LLC, which is an HR consulting firm, and I specialize and decoding employee engagement for managers, and really being in the employee experience employee engagement space. But in addition to my business, I have been in HR over 10 years, like I have been in the healthcare industry, retail, building materials, coatings, chemicals, you name it, I’ve had a lot of HR experience in these different industries. And it’s given me the opportunity to really learn a lot about people learn about business, and how they intersect when it comes to looking at engagement and building that strategy. And so, I’m really excited about the opportunity to dive a little bit deeper into, you know, my HR expertise, how that led me into engagement, and how I can continue to support you and give you some tips here today to consider as you look at your own engagement strategies.
So when we step back, and we look at what engagement look like in 2019, to 2020. What were some employers see in their employee engagement?

Yeah, so when it comes to engagement, there are some standard engagement factors that you will see then and that you will still see now. So things that come up like compensation, looking at being able to have flexibility, but it wasn’t in the same way as it is now. And in 2020, you would see things like, more so people filling, Are they satisfied with the work that they they’re doing? What types of benefits are things that the company are offering to them, so was pretty much I like to call those like the foundational engagement, tenants that you need to be able to address when it comes to any type of employee. But when 2020 happened, that pendulum swung, and there was a big emphasis around flexibility, purpose work, and really being able to make sure people felt like they belong or that they were looked being looked at as an individual, as opposed to just this. This one size fits all, I heard that us earlier one size fits all approach when it comes to engaging them. And just from a topic standpoint, when it comes to equity, really being able to look and see what is the intersectionality when it comes to engagement. Are you creating consistent experiences for all your employees? And how does that show up? How are you? How are you making sure you get insight into that? Because I can tell you right now without being intentional with that, more than likely you’re missing the mark.

Absolutely, absolutely agree. So I jumped a little head because I’m excited about you talking about employee engagement, but out of HR overall, how did you end up focus and really looking at employee engagement especially as it relates number one to leaders. So let’s just talk about employee engagement and then leaders. And then we can tie those two together.

Absolutely. So I wrote a book called Why I broke up with my company. So people look at HR, and they view HR as if they’re not having an employee experience. And we are having an employee experience, I just So shout out to all the HR people out there. And I asked you all to show us some grace in regards to that. But throughout my career, I was having an employee experience. And from that, I started to get insight around, you know, the things that were going well, the things that weren’t going well, why weren’t they going well? How can that be improved by myself? How can that be improved by the leader. And so in going through my own journey, then I started, I moved away from the micro while just looking at myself, and started looking at the macro, while if I’m having these experiences, other people are also having these experiences, how can I assist them with improving the experience and getting better at that. And so that helped me hone in on really leveraging love relationships, and comparing it to working relationships, to help that resonate with people to show that how much energy you put into this relationship is going to determine how well it works. And you’re always creating experiences for people, are you creating the right ones. And in the process of doing that, that’s where I saw how leadership is really an activator for engagement, the leader can really drive engagement in the positive direction, or they can be poor leaders in sending in the other direction. And so there is a lot of power that leaders have in being able to keep a workforce engaged and focus on the things that they need to accomplish for the organization.

Yeah, those good leaders will keep you engaged, those not so good leaders will drive people out the door or to another team or department or division or country, but they’re gonna go somewhere else somewhere. So I love how you bridge those two, because it’s really important that understanding employee engagement is tied to leadership. And it’s not like, oh, well, they’re, they’re not engaged. I’m not responsible for them doing their job. It’s like, well, let’s talk about that. Right? You have to own what that means to be a leader. And this is this is the thing I wrote a few years ago, many years, not that many years, less than two years ago, when I was still in corporate. They sent out a an employee survey. And they said, What do you think about your leadership team? I said, number one, you can’t tell me they’re my leaders. Because I may not follow them. I just work here. Right? The person I call my leader does not have a C suite title, or a VP title, right? And I think I always push back on that, like you mean your management team. Because oftentimes, you’re a lot of leaders aren’t accessible, the higher up they go, the they’re not accessible to people. And I think if you’re a true leader, you’re accessible to people, I don’t mean to the point we’re in, there was a line outside your door. But it means that if somebody calls, whether it’s the sake of mourning, or to say they’re having an issue, you’re responsive to that. Right, right. And oftentimes, like you’re in the wrong place, and I think it, I have a whole other definition on take it when it comes to management and the terms leadership in the workplace, it needs to be earned. And it’s not given and even telling me you’re my leader, like, Oh, I’m not following y’all to the bathroom. And I have. So that, you know,

I don’t believe fully agree with you on that. Like when I’m sharing tips around engagement, I will say Attention managers. And so I’ve had people talk to me about well, why do you say managers? Why don’t you just call them leaders, everyone? Everyone isn’t a leader? I agree with you. I definitely think that there’s a distinction between management and leaders, you manage the process, you read people, and everybody hasn’t made that transition to fully leading people they are trying to use management to to do the act of what a leader is supposed to do. And without that clarity and distinction. Those are some of the challenges and pitfalls organizations miss, and it manifests in the engagement of their employees. So something that’s simple and subtle is really getting clear on the definition of what a leader is supposed to be doing. Is is paramount to drive in the engagement?
Absolutely. So I think you answered this, but I’m asking anyway. What’s the difference about your approach to employee engagement? Then what others are doing in the space right now?

Yeah, so a couple of things, I would say one, a lot of a lot of different companies are looking at kind of the one size fits all, and not really doing the comprehensive look at engagement. So where I see my organization having an advantage, it’s really helping organizations get clarity, to transition from the reality to their aspirational state, because a lot of times organizations look at engagement, they think they’re in the aspirational state, where the reality says something completely different. So being able to help them understand what that is what that means. And then helping them go deeper. Because at times when it comes to engagement, people can remain very surface with that, you can something as simple for example, like, if you asked your employees, you know, did you review it, the survey feedback, you may get five different responses based on how those individuals looked at the question and how they process it. One person may say, I got the feedback, the other person may say, I got the feedback, but you didn’t do any action with it. So I’m going to ding you here. Other person may say, I didn’t get it because I was in a different groups, there are a lot of different responses that can come with that. And without doing the extra work of going below the surface, you don’t really get to that information. So that’s the operation side of me really looking for the root cause versus the cookie cutter approach of here’s engagement, here’s the things that you can look to work on. The other piece is really looking at the intersectionality part of engagement. As I mentioned earlier, if you are not leaning in, in that space, and if you think that everybody’s experience is the same, I’m going to tell you now it’s not. So you need to take the time to really review and see where are those differences? What are those nuances? And how can you improve that because it’s likely to show up in your results, or it’s not showing up in your results, you are getting good engagement results. But it’s you’re not seeing the impact in your business results, you’re not seeing the impact and productivity, you’re not seeing impact in these other areas. And that is informing you that even though you may have great results, there’s something else that’s amiss, that you have to really dig deeper and get an understanding about.

Absolutely. So Whoo, you got to my favorites spot. Right, right, we got enough time to dig into this, okay. Because I always like to get the tactical stuff. You talked about data. And you talked about intersectionality. And you talked about managers, and I’m gonna put up this quote, real quickly, very quickly, Haley said, I just saw a quote stating, become the kind of leader that people will follow voluntarily, even if you have no title or position. And that’s that that’s my challenge. Like that’s, that’s what that’s all I’m saying. So I’m gonna go back to where we are, where we’re really talking about data intersectionality, and looking at what’s going on at those levels. And the reason I talk about this is organization like well as a whole or a majority, we’re doing well. When you’re looking at an equitable workplaces, there is no majority, you really have to look to see who and why it’s not part of that. And and I want to get into that that intersectionality part as you utilize data, what were the things that you went through in that in that lens, and the data you’re looking at to try to understand what the what, what type of engagement strategy to create and tactics to include in order to improve engagement?

Yeah, so I look at it in a couple of ways. First, you have to have like the quantitative data and the qualitative piece. So once you’re getting the Insight if you have a survey versus if you get use employee engagement surveys or not, you can leverage that as a starting point to get some insight as to where you need to look to begin to have conversations, but there are other pieces to the engagement story. So if you are not looking at turnover in If you’re not looking at employee complaints, if you are not looking at discretionary effort, and when I say discretionary efforts, that’s not when, you know, employees are working long hours, because they got to get the work done, it’s more so they are volunteering their time, they are happy to give their time to do extra things in the workplace or take on additional responsibilities as they go forward. And so those are different pieces that you have to first start with the the quantitative part, but then there’s the piece of you have to have some conversation, the data means nothing without the insight to what that actually needs. So you may have a certain number in these areas. But if you’re not doing stay interviews, you’re not doing exit interviews, if you are not having focus groups around your engagement with different populations, and splitting up to get insight around that you’re missing the mark there. So for example, it may be with different people of color that you are looking at having those conversations with, it could be different band levels, or great levels that you have in your workplace that you may have a higher level of engagement at the top of the organization. But as you continue to go get go deeper and cascade through the organization that shifts. And so where does that shift, and when it does shift, why, and really look to understand that as you go forward. And that helps you start to get more insight on things that you need to do that’s tailored to specific groups, as opposed to this one size fits all engagement approach.

I absolutely love it. Thank you so much for digging in. And actually like telling, hey, go go have a focus group. But who we have to talk to the people? Yes, we have to talk. Yeah, you’re gonna have to do that. We really appreciate you doing that. Oh, okay. So putting the human back in Human Resources is what I love to say about your approach. In doing that, because too often we’re trying to automate, we’re trying to separate. And it’s really important to get back to that human side, even though we’re looking at data is a people problem that has to be solved by people, data is just a part or tool to help us do that. And I love how you brought that aspect in here. Now, I just want to make sure we don’t have any no questions. But I of course I do. Now, as you’re looking at the data, what how do you know if something isn’t success? Maybe that’s an anomaly. When you’re getting the results back in after after you start working through your strategy?

Yes. So the first part is you have to get clarity. And you have to define what is your engagement story. So that helps you with the baseline of what you’re looking what you currently have. And it needs to be connected with the strategy. So as you are engaging your people, what is it? How do you see that manifesting in the workplace, so then that helps you kind of hone in on the the different KPIs, you want to look to measure and align with your engagement strategy. So you get your baseline, and then you start to manage that. But then it’s like, What trends are you seeing what different engagement factors you need to introduce? Those are, once you have the story, then that helps you determine how you measure it, and align that success to organization success. And a lot of times what happens is the engagement strategy is separate from business strategy. It’s one in the same, you it’s just a component of that business strategy. So if you are looking at it different, like, oh, we need to work on this thing. No, it needs to be connected with what you are trying to achieve. What is your mission? What is the purpose? And how are you bringing that alive for your people? And how are you engaging them in the process? And a part of engaging them is it’s not there’s reciprocity. You have to remember that, yes, you know, there people are performing the service and things like that, but there still needs to be reciprocity there. What are you giving him pouring into them so they are able to pour into your company and then be able to drive it the way you want to? So you are the employer of choice. You are the leader in the market. And when you don’t invest there is no different from the business side. If you don’t invest in growing your business if you don’t invest in it. You know, in materials and products and expansions and things like that you may run the risk of falling behind the competition. So what’s the difference within an employee? What’s the difference in being able to engage them? So there are different aspects, even from a business side, if you think about it from that lens, if you take that, and put that over to the people side would help to be able to guide your engagement strategy in a different way.

Oh, thank you so much. For for just one to two last questions. I’ve never number one, to ask questions. Is that such a thing as it will be? For people that just getting started understanding where their employee engagement, what is that one thing they have to do?
The one thing they have to do is understand their story. A lot of people just go into engagement haphazardly, and you have to understand what is current state. So having that clarity of where you stand today, and how that connects with you being able to execute on your business initiatives.
I love it. I love it. Next. Okay, then the final last question. Can people connect with you?
That’s a great question. So you can connect with me on LinkedIn, I am very active on LinkedIn. And I definitely would love you to give your feedback and comment and engage with me. I love having dialogues with people. And the posts that I put up I love connecting on their posts that they’re putting them is really a community being a part of my LinkedIn family. So definitely make sure you connect with me, I will connect with you and engage in your content and vice versa.

Thank you so much, Marissa, for joining us today. Be sure you connect with her. You can also pick up her book and and I and I love why I broke up with my company. It’s like, I don’t know, sort of kind of feels like a lifetime movie, but not Queenie, like Tifa as maybe terace and how it’s really gonna happen. So I just I don’t know. But I think it’s gonna be a lot of fun and might end up in New Orleans in Miami. Oh, no. I think I think I really really liked that. Um, I we do have one comment I want to share. I agree Marissa understand your organization’s story. This will help take you from where you are to where you desire to go. Thanks for sharing. Yeah. Dr. Pearson, thank you so much for being here today. She’d been hanging out. She’d been running strong for like three hours. So we’re glad she could remain here. So Marissa, everybody check her out. Be sure to check out her book. I will talk to you later. Thanks for joining today.

Thank you. Thank you for everybody that joined I look forward to connecting with you. All
right. Bye bye.

How U.S. Manufacturing Companies can Utilize a Talent Marketplace To Retain Women Of Color

How U.S. Manufacturing Companies can Utilize a Talent Marketplace To Retain Women Of Color

Many companies are striving to employ a new talented breed of workers to elevate production levels. However, they are encountering problems that are easily solved by the talent marketplace. A talent marketplace provides companies with a way to retain diverse talents and enhances employee development targets.

Most manufacturing industries in the U.S. prefer male workers to women since they believe women are more fragile and have less potential to work in different roles and offices. However, those are old beliefs that are no longer in line with the ethics of working in the modern system.

Women employees workers are now even doing better than men employees males in some positions, especially when you look at the performance of black and Hispanic women.

It makes sense to include women in manufacturing in every aspect owing to the different viewpoints that women bring to the table that are crucial in decision-making. A company’s net profitability may rise by 15% even if just 30% of its executives are women.

However, U.S. women only take up 29% of the manufacturing industry talent workforce which is a bit distressing. Despite that, women see the industry as profitable, and many of them are still leaving the industry due to the lack of life-work balance.

Also, the lack of flexible work schedules makes them think otherwise of the industry. This is why it is important to learn how to retain talented women in the manufacturing workforce.

1. Getting talented women that match positions.

It is still believed that there are many talented women in the manufacturing field with great technological know-how. It is therefore mandatory to have talented women in a befitting position to further retain them. Black and Hispanics are especially good at this. If companies wish to retain women in the field it’s very important to hire more women that fit a position than just only males.

2. Provide equitable pay for all talents.

One of the things U.S Hispanic women complain about before leaving the industry is no increase in wages which is not good. Companies need to focus on pay equity to close the pay gap and make manufacturing work more enticing to women.

3. By promoting professional development

Also, a key factor in retaining women is by encouraging them to explore opportunities for professional development. Women always stress the need to have more skills that can make them outstanding. If this is supported there will be more talented women in the industry.

Lastly, the talent marketplace is a great platform to find strong and determined women ready to work in the manufacturing industry, however, work should also be done on how to retain them.

 


Have you read this? 

Using Analytics & Data-Driven Approach To Retain Diverse Talent In Your Company

Reach your diverse workforce recruiting and retention goals with

 Diversity Recruitment & Retention Toolkit!